| Peer-Reviewed

Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates

Received: 30 July 2021    Accepted: 17 August 2021    Published: 27 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Incorporation of sugarcane industry by-products into soil can reduce the susceptibility of soils to compaction. However, the significance of incorporated filter cake and filter cake compost at different soil water contents at the time of compaction using proctor test load is not well documented. In this context, study was conducted at three Ethiopian sugar Estates in 2017 to examine the effect of filter cake and filter cake compost incorporation to three soils different in clay content on soil maximum dry density, total porosity at MDD, critical moisture content under laboratory conditions. Sugarcane residues were added to soils at rates of 0, 7.75 g of residues per kg of soils. The results of the study showed that the maximum dry bulk density with no sugarcane residue added was achieved at 15.94% for light, 25% for medium and 28.6% for heavy clay. Filter cake incorporated at the rate of 30 t ha-1 reduced the soil compactibility induced by proctor test load at water content of 0.7 PL for light clay soils, 0.97 PL for medium clay and at water content of 0.98 PL for the heavy clay soils. In all three soil types at 0 t ha-1 and 30 t ha-1 residue application levels, the total porosity attained a minimum value at critical moisture content and critical moisture content for the maximum dry density increased as the clay content increased. Filter cake and filter cake compost reduced the maximum dry density of heavy clay soil by 4 and 27.6%, respectively, as compared to the control. Nevertheless, this residues increased total porosity at critical moisture content, respectively, by 2.44 and 46.9% over the control for heavy clay soils. Therefore, it can be concluded that sugarcane residue was most effective in reducing soil compactibility at moisture content less than PL compared to water content higher than PL. Moreover, filter cake compost was more effective in reducing soil compactibility than filter cake. Finally, the study recommended that the heavy machineries operation during sugarcane seedbed preparation and harvesting; shall be made when soil moisture is below 0.60, 0.9 and 0.91 PL, respectively, for light, medium and heavy clay soils and after treating the soil with either filter cake or filter cake compost tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil clay levels for the case of filter cake compost and more rates for both sugarcane residues.

Published in International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13
Page(s) 86-95
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Soil Compactbility, Proctor Test, Sugarcane Residues, Soil Types

References
[1] Ahmad, N., Hassan, F. and, Qadir, G. 2007. Effect of subsurface soil compaction and improvement measures on soil properties. International Journal Agriculture and Biology., 9: 509-13.
[2] Hamza, M. A. and Anderson, W. K. 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems. A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil and Tillage Research, 82: 121-145.
[3] Alvarez, C. R.; Taboada, M. A., Gutiérrez, F. H.; Fernández, P. L. and Prystupa, P. 2009. Topsoil properties as affected by tillage systems in the rolling pampa region of Argentina. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73: 242-1250.
[4] Hugar, M. G. and Soraganvi, S. V. 2014. Impact of Soil Organic carbon on Bulk Density and plasticity index of Arid Soils of Raichur. Karnataka, India.
[5] Ridge, R. 2013. Sugarcane Fertilizing for High Yield. IPI Bulletin No. 21. International Potash Institute, Coral Cove, Australia.
[6] Ambachew, D. and Abiy, F. 2009. Assessment of Some Soil physicochemical Properties of Soils of Wonji- Shoa, Metahara and Finchaa Sugarcane Plantations. Annual research report. Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Service Division, Wonji, Ethiopia. pp. 118-130.
[7] Ambachew, D., Abiy, F., Zeleke, T. 2012. Correlation of Foliar Nutrient Status with Yield of Sugarcane Varieties at Different Crop Stages and Nitrogen Levels at Wonji-Shoa and Finchaa Sugarcane Plantations of Ethiopia. Ethiop. Journal of Applied Science Technololy. 3: 9-22.
[8] Ambachew, D. and Ademe, A. 2009. Determination of optimum nitrogen and phosphorus rate for sugarcane at Finchaa Sugarcane plantation. Proc. Ethiopian Sugar Ind. Biennial conf, 1: 117-125.
[9] Atsbeha, N. 2012. prediction of compaction characteristics from atterberg limits for fine-grained soils” Thesis for Master of Science degree, Faculty of Technology, Addis Ababa University.
[10] Diazzorita, M., Grove, J. H. and Perfect, E. 2001. Laboratory compaction of soils using a small mold procedure. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 1593-1598.
[11] Krueger, M. K. 2011. The Michigan Cone Test: A Reliability Study. Msc Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Michigan, USA.
[12] Mari, G. R. and Changying, J. 2008. Influence of agricultural machinery traffic on soil compaction patterns, root development and plant growth, overview. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 3: 49-62.
[13] Barzegar A. R., Mahmoodi, S. H, Hamedi, F., Abdolvahabi, F. 2005. Long term sugarcane cultivation effects on physical properties of fine textured soils. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 7: 59-68.
[14] Datta, S. P., R. K. Rattan and S. Chandra, 2010. Labile soil organic carbon, soil fertility and crop productivity as influenced by manure and mineral fertilizers in the tropics. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 173: 715-726.
[15] Pisa, C. and M. Wuta, 2013. Evaluation of composting performance ofmixtures of chicken blood and maize stover in Harare, Zimbabwe. Int. J. Recycl. Organic Waste Agriculture, 2 (5): 1-11.
[16] Tesfaye, W., Kibebew, K., Bobe, B., Melesse, T. and Teklu, E. 2020. Effects of Compaction at Different Moisture Contents on Selected Soil Properties and Sugarcane Growth and Sugar Yield at Metahara Sugar Estate. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 15: 78.
[17] Zhang, H., Hartge, K. H., Ringe, H. 1997. Effectiveness of organic matter incorporation in reducing soil compactibility. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 239-245.
[18] ESC (Ethiopian Sugar Corporations). 2013. Annual report. Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Service Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[19] ESC (Ethiopian Sugar Corporations). 2014. Ten Years (2004-2014) Climatic Data Obtained from the National Meteorological Agency of Wonji-Shoa, Metahara and Finchaa Stations. Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Service Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[20] ESC (Ethiopian Sugar Corporations). 2015. Ten Years (2004-2014) Climatic Data Obtained from the National Meteorological Agency of Wonji-Shoa, Metahara and Finchaa Stations. Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Service Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[21] Tesfaye, W., Kibebew, K., Bobe, B., Melesse, T. and Teklu, E. 2016. Effects of long term mechanized sugarcane cultivation and soil compactibilityamelorative measures on selected soil properties and sugar yield at three Ethiopian Sugar Estates. PhD Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. pp. 202.
[22] APECS (Agrima Project Engineering and Consultancy Services). 1987. A Report on the Agricultural Research Services of the Ethiopian Sugar Corporation (ESC). Matha Private, Bombay, India. pp. 1-414.
[23] BAI (Booker Agricultural International) in association with Generation Integrated Rural Development Consultant. 2009. Re-evaluation of the Plantation Soils at Metahara Sugar Factory. Final Report. BAI, London, England.
[24] Zeleke, T. 2008. Characterization of soil management classes of Metahara Sugar Estate in terms of their physical and hydraulic properties. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[25] Tadesse, N. 2004. Summary of Metahara Sugar Factory Weather Data for the Year 2004 and Average of the Last Ten Years (1993-2004). Ethiopian Sugar Industry Support Center Research and Training Service Division, Wonji, Ethiopia.
[26] Ademe, A. 2009. Response of Sugarcane to Composted Filter Cake with Vinasse and Inorganic Fertilizers at Finchaa Sugar Estate. Annual research report. Ethiopian Sugar Corporation Research and Training Service Division, Wonji, Ethiopia.
[27] Michael, M. and Seleshi, B. 2007. Irrigation Practices in Ethiopia: Characteristics of Selected Irrigation Schemes. Integrated Water Management Institute, Colombo, Srilanka.
[28] Tesfaye, W., Kibebew, K., Bobe, B., Melesse, T and Teklu, E., 2018. Long Term Effects of Cultivation on Physicochemical Properties of Soils at Metahara Sugar Estate. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 18: 246-257.
[29] Hazelton, P. and Murphy, B. 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? 2nd ed. CSIRO Publishing, Colling wood, Australia. pp. 169.
[30] Mahamuni, S. V. and Patil, A. S. 2012. Microbial Consortium Treatment to Distillery Spent Wash and Press mud Cake Through Pit and Windrow System of Composting. Shardabai Pawar Mahila College, Maharashtra, India.
[31] Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W. and Womer, P. L. 2002. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analyses. A Working Manual, 2nd ed. TSBF –CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
[32] Soil Survey Staff. (1999). A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey. Agricultural Handbook. 436. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
[33] Jamison, V. C., Weaver, H. H. and Reed, I. F. 1950. A hammer-driven soil core sampler. Soil Science, 69: 487–496.
[34] Rao, M., Singa, P. and Raju, M. J. 2005. Laboratory Manual on Soil Physical Properties, 1st edition. BS Publications, New Delhi, India.
[35] Rowell, D. L. 1994. Soil Science: Method and applications. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group UK Limited Addison, Wesley, England. pp. 350.
[36] ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials). 2007. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA.
[37] Reynolds, S. G. 1970. The gravimetric method of soil moisture determination part I: a study of equipment, and methodological problems. Journal of Hydrology, 11: 258-273.
[38] Habtamu, K. 2006. Examining atterberg limits for expansive soils. MSc Thesis, Addis Ababa. University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[39] Lindsey, M. R. 2009. Establishing soil compaction thresholds for the M1A1 Abrams Tank at Camp Minden, Louisiana. PhD Thesis, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, USA. pp. 163
[40] Girma, A. 2009. Effect of filter cake and mineral fertilizers on yield of plant cane in the sugarcane plantations of Ethiopia. Proc. Ethiop. Sugar. Ind. Bienn. Conf., 1: 126-136.
[41] McLean, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A. L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Part 2. Agronomy Series No. 9. ASA, SSSA, Madison, USA, 199-234.
[42] Walkly, A. and Black, I. A. 1934. An examination of digestion method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the Chromic Acid Titration. Soil Science, 37: 29-38.
[43] Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey.
[44] Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, L. and Dean, A. 1954. Estimation of Available P in Soils by Extraction with NaHCO3. USDA Cir. 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington D. C., USA.
[45] Bray, R., and Kurz, L. (1945). Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorous in soil. Soil science Journal, 59: 39-45.
[46] Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphorus in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27: 31-36.
[47] Van Reeuwijk, L. P. 1992. Procedures for soil analysis. International soil reference and information center (ISRIC) Wageningen, The Netherlands. p 23.
[48] Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1973. Determination of Total Nitrogen in Plant Material. Agronomy Journal, 65: 109-112.
[49] Chapman, H. and Pratt. (1961). Methods of analysis for soils, plant and water. University California, Berkeley.
[50] Carmo, D. L.; Silva, C. A. 2012. Quantification methods of carbon and organic matter in organic residues. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 36: 1211-1220.
[51] SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2002. SAS Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
[52] Nhantumbo, A. B. and Cambule, A. H. 2006. Bulk density test as a function of texture for agricultural soils in Maputo Province of Mozanbique. Soil and Tillage Research, 87: 231-239.
[53] Wesley, T., Ndiema, C., Mutai, E. 2015. Assessment of Soil Compaction Levels by Farm Machineryin Cultivated Fields of Elfam Farm. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 2: 95-100.
[54] Jiang, Z. P., R. L. Yang, P. W. Guang, L. Qing, M. S. Tian, C. M. Yan, H. Y. Zhang and Y. L. Chang, 2012. Effect of long-term vinasse application on physico-chemical properties of sugarcane field soils. Sugar. Tech., 14: 412-417
[55] Tesfaye, W., Kibebew, K., Bobe, B., Melesse, T. and Teklu, E. 2019. Effects of Subsoiling and Organic Amendments on Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties and Sugar Yield in Metahara Sugar Estate. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 19: 312-325.
[56] Chamen, W. C.; Moxey, A. P.; Towers, W.; Balana, B.; Hallett, P. D. 2015. Mitigating arable soil compaction: A review and analysis of available cost and benefit data. Soil Tillage Res., 146: 10–25.
[57] Thomas, G. W., Haszler, G. R. and Blevins, R. L. 1996. The effect of organic matter and tillage on maximum compactibility of soils using the proctor test. Soil science, 161: 502-508.
[58] Meyer, J. H., Antwerpen, R. 2010. Advances in sugarcane soil fertility research in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 27: 19-31.
[59] Barzegar, A. R., Asoodar, M. A. and Ansari, M. 2000. Effectiveness of sugarcane residue incorporation at different water contents and the Proctor compaction loads in reducing soil compactibilty. Soil and Tillage Reseach, 57: 167-172.
[60] Usaborisut, P. and Niyamapa, T. 2010. Effects of machine induced soil compaction on growth and yield of sugarcane. America Journal of Agriculture and Biology Science, 3: 269-273.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tesfaye Wakgari. (2021). Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science, 6(4), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tesfaye Wakgari. Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates. Int. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 6(4), 86-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tesfaye Wakgari. Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates. Int J Energy Environ Sci. 2021;6(4):86-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13,
      author = {Tesfaye Wakgari},
      title = {Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates},
      journal = {International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science},
      volume = {6},
      number = {4},
      pages = {86-95},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijees.20210604.13},
      abstract = {Incorporation of sugarcane industry by-products into soil can reduce the susceptibility of soils to compaction. However, the significance of incorporated filter cake and filter cake compost at different soil water contents at the time of compaction using proctor test load is not well documented. In this context, study was conducted at three Ethiopian sugar Estates in 2017 to examine the effect of filter cake and filter cake compost incorporation to three soils different in clay content on soil maximum dry density, total porosity at MDD, critical moisture content under laboratory conditions. Sugarcane residues were added to soils at rates of 0, 7.75 g of residues per kg of soils. The results of the study showed that the maximum dry bulk density with no sugarcane residue added was achieved at 15.94% for light, 25% for medium and 28.6% for heavy clay. Filter cake incorporated at the rate of 30 t ha-1 reduced the soil compactibility induced by proctor test load at water content of 0.7 PL for light clay soils, 0.97 PL for medium clay and at water content of 0.98 PL for the heavy clay soils. In all three soil types at 0 t ha-1 and 30 t ha-1 residue application levels, the total porosity attained a minimum value at critical moisture content and critical moisture content for the maximum dry density increased as the clay content increased. Filter cake and filter cake compost reduced the maximum dry density of heavy clay soil by 4 and 27.6%, respectively, as compared to the control. Nevertheless, this residues increased total porosity at critical moisture content, respectively, by 2.44 and 46.9% over the control for heavy clay soils. Therefore, it can be concluded that sugarcane residue was most effective in reducing soil compactibility at moisture content less than PL compared to water content higher than PL. Moreover, filter cake compost was more effective in reducing soil compactibility than filter cake. Finally, the study recommended that the heavy machineries operation during sugarcane seedbed preparation and harvesting; shall be made when soil moisture is below 0.60, 0.9 and 0.91 PL, respectively, for light, medium and heavy clay soils and after treating the soil with either filter cake or filter cake compost tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil clay levels for the case of filter cake compost and more rates for both sugarcane residues.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effectiveness of Sugar Industry Organic Wastes in Reducing Soil Compatibility in Soils of Three Ethiopian Sugar Estates
    AU  - Tesfaye Wakgari
    Y1  - 2021/08/27
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13
    T2  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    JF  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    JO  - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 95
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9546
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20210604.13
    AB  - Incorporation of sugarcane industry by-products into soil can reduce the susceptibility of soils to compaction. However, the significance of incorporated filter cake and filter cake compost at different soil water contents at the time of compaction using proctor test load is not well documented. In this context, study was conducted at three Ethiopian sugar Estates in 2017 to examine the effect of filter cake and filter cake compost incorporation to three soils different in clay content on soil maximum dry density, total porosity at MDD, critical moisture content under laboratory conditions. Sugarcane residues were added to soils at rates of 0, 7.75 g of residues per kg of soils. The results of the study showed that the maximum dry bulk density with no sugarcane residue added was achieved at 15.94% for light, 25% for medium and 28.6% for heavy clay. Filter cake incorporated at the rate of 30 t ha-1 reduced the soil compactibility induced by proctor test load at water content of 0.7 PL for light clay soils, 0.97 PL for medium clay and at water content of 0.98 PL for the heavy clay soils. In all three soil types at 0 t ha-1 and 30 t ha-1 residue application levels, the total porosity attained a minimum value at critical moisture content and critical moisture content for the maximum dry density increased as the clay content increased. Filter cake and filter cake compost reduced the maximum dry density of heavy clay soil by 4 and 27.6%, respectively, as compared to the control. Nevertheless, this residues increased total porosity at critical moisture content, respectively, by 2.44 and 46.9% over the control for heavy clay soils. Therefore, it can be concluded that sugarcane residue was most effective in reducing soil compactibility at moisture content less than PL compared to water content higher than PL. Moreover, filter cake compost was more effective in reducing soil compactibility than filter cake. Finally, the study recommended that the heavy machineries operation during sugarcane seedbed preparation and harvesting; shall be made when soil moisture is below 0.60, 0.9 and 0.91 PL, respectively, for light, medium and heavy clay soils and after treating the soil with either filter cake or filter cake compost tentatively. Nevertheless, in order to give conclusive recommendation further research studies are needed for more soil clay levels for the case of filter cake compost and more rates for both sugarcane residues.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Natural Resource Management and Veterinary Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Sections